Please note: To view the design of this website, you need a browser that supports web standards. The content of this site is accessible (with no formatting) to any browser. Upgrade to a Web standards compliant browser.
Skip to the content of this page

John K. Leypoldt, PhD

Synopsis: Leypoldt JK. Urea standard Kt/V for assessing dialysis treatment adequacy. Hemodial Int 2004;8:193-7.

Urea standard Kt/V urea (stdKt/Vurea) has been proposed as a dose measure to assess the adequacy of dialysis treatments of arbitrary length and frequency. It is based on two fundamental assumptions: 1) that clinical outcomes for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients are equivalent, and 2) that the equivalency of such clinical outcomes is achieved when the mean predialysis blood urea nitrogen or urea concentration is identical for both therapies. The relationships among urea stdKt/Vurea, equilibrated Kt/Vurea, and single-pool Kt/V urea are reviewed, and the assumptions required for the validity of urea stdKt/Vurea as a universal dose measure to describe dialysis treatment adequacy are discussed. It is proposed that urea stdKt/Vurea is a dose measure for both water-soluble and protein-bound toxin clearances; therefore, this parameter may be a practical dose measure for assessing the adequacy of dialysis during treatments of arbitrary length and frequency.

Commentary by Todd S. Ing, MD

Dr. Leypoldt asserts in the present communication that the standard Kt/Vurea concept is based on the hypothesis that equal peak or predialysis concentrations of a water-soluble uremic toxin in blood, such as urea, predict equivalent overall patient outcomes. Indeed, this standard Kt/V value, the brainchild of Gotch1,2, may serve as a universal dose gauge for hemodialysis therapies of arbitrary length and frequency. Formulas and nomograms depicting the relationship between the single-pool Kt/V per treatment and the weekly standard Kt/V for various treatment durations and different treatment frequencies have been reported1,3,4. In the instance of 6 times per week, short daily hemodialysis therapy, the minimum per-session, single-pool Kt/V corresponding to a weekly standard Kt/V of approximately 2.0 (for patients with a residual renal function of less than 2 mL/min/1.73 square meters surface area) has been suggested by Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) to be 0.55. [It is noteworthy that a weekly standard Kt/V value of 2.1 is closely equivalent to that dialysis dose provided by 3 conventional, thrice weekly (e.g., 3.5 hours per session) hemodialysis treatments with a single-pool Kt/V level of 1.2 each1]. Future studies are required to determine if this novel standard Kt/V concept is the dialysis adequacy measure of choice.

References

  1. Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modeling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13 (Suppl 6):S10-4.
  2. Gotch FA. Modeling the dose of home dialysis. Home Hemodial Int 1999;3:37-40.
  3. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL. Predicting treatment dose for novel therapies using urea standard Kt/V. Semin Dial 2004;17:142-5.
  4. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL. Calculation of standard Kt/V (stdKt/V) with corrections for postdialysis urea rebound (abstract). Hemodial Int 2003;7:80.
  5. Clinical practice recommendations for guideline 4: Minimally adequate hemodialysis. National Kidney Foundation KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations. 2006 updates. Hemodialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48 (Suppl 1):S53-62 (Table 13).

Disclaimer: These abstracts are only intended for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and for the intellectual exchanges of innovative ideas among healthcare workers. Although the innovative articles we select for inclusion in our Innovative Papers section have all appeared in prestigious publications, not all the avant-garde ideas conveyed in these articles have been accepted into standard medical practice. Patients should obtain advice related to their medical care from their own healthcare providers, and not from information provided by our Innovative Papers section. Clinicians must make informed decisions with regard to the care of their patients. Information obtained from ISHD is for the purposes of general medical education only and should not be misconstrued as medical advice. Neither ISHD nor the information contributors are responsible for any possible injury sustained by patients who are treated by clinicians who mistakenly use information conveyed anywhere on this site for therapeutic purposes.

Copyright ©2010 International Society for Hemodialysis. All rights reserved.